In less than 10 years, many employers will no longer offer regular health insurance but, instead, will offer employees medical allowances. Whatever is not spent on health care will be saved by employees for retirement, predict two Cornell heath-care experts.
These so-called medical savings accounts (MSAs), they claim, not only would save employees, employers and society billions of dollars each year but also would provide employees with more freedom and control over health-care choices, as well as incentives to stay healthy and keep medical expenses down. At the same time, they would give employers a way to offer a benefit plan in which they no longer bear most of the risk of rising premium costs, providing better budget control and a relief from fast-growing administrative and legal burdens.
MSAs, the Cornell researchers say, also would replace the current system of managed care, which is widely criticized for focusing on profits at the expense of quality.
"Today's employment-based health insurance is a historical artifact that is outdated, impractical and too expensive to maintain," said Roger Battistella, professor of health policy and management, writing in the next issue of the journal Compensation and Benefits Management (Winter 1999).
"It just doesn't fit in today's society, with its aging work force, skyrocketing health insurance premiums, global competition and employers' legal exposure to medical malpractice because of injuries and complications workers and their families may experience when managed-care firms deny access to cost-ineffective but potentially beneficial health services."
With David Burchfield, assistant professor of health care financial management, Battistella compared regular employment-based insurance with MSAs and vouchers and concluded MSAs are, by far, more practical and cost-effective, not only for employers and workers but for the country as well. While vouchers, which allow employees to use earmarked money to choose their own insurance, do the most to simplify and limit employers' continuing involvement, the researchers believe MSAs will emerge as the solution of choice.
"They are inherently more popular with workers, and they provide a more effective instrument for curbing health spending because of the built-in incentives for individuals to become more prudent health care purchasers," Battistella said..
MSAs look so promising that Medicare recipients will be able to choose them beginning next year. "The beauty of MSAs is that, unlike health insurance, whatever consumers don't spend can go directly into their retirement accounts, which will dramatically reduce waste in health care," said Burchfield, a health care economist.
Although federal regulations now essentially prohibit the adoption of MSAs for companies with more than 50 employees, the government is closely watching the several dozen small companies currently offering MSAs. Battistella and Burchfield predict that within several years restrictions will be lifted and MSAs rapidly will gain in popularity.
The two faculty members explain that instead of buying today's increasingly complex and unpopular managed-care policies, employers would purchase a single catastrophic health insurance policy for their work force offering basic fee-for-service benefits. However, the policy would carry an annual high individual deductible of, for example, $3,000. Each worker would be provided with an annual account of somewhat less, possibly $2,000. Workers would be free to spend any part of this on health-related expenses, with any unused amount rolled over to the following year until a certain amount, perhaps $10,000, accumulates. This money could then be transferred to a retirement fund.
In the voucher system, employers would earmark a sum of money for employees to spend on their choice of health insurance coverage. This system, however, would not allow consumers to save unspent amounts, and employees would have less of an incentive to economize in their use of medically questionable and unnecessary physician services.
Battistella and Burchfield also argue that MSAs would reduce the number of Americans who lack health coverage. Because such allowances would simplify fringe-benefit administration and put a cap on health-care contributions, employers not currently offering health insurance would be encouraged to do so, and those already providing it would be less inclined to discontinue the benefit.
Today about one-third of the work force is uninsured or experiences disruptions in coverage. "More alarming yet, three-quarters of the currently or recently uninsured are members of families containing a full-time or part-time worker," Battistella said.
"We think that the benefits of MSAs, though no 'magic bullet,' so outweigh the disadvantages that we will see an inevitable transition from traditional health insurance to MSAs, thereby radically changing how employees get medical benefits over the next decade," concluded Burchfield.
| Cornell Chronicle Front Page | | Table of Contents | | Cornell News Service Home Page |