April 14, 2016

Finicky deer avoid some invasive plants, promoting spread

deer buffet
Kristine Averill
At the Penn State Deer Research Center, ecologists offered deer a multiple-choice array of eight invasive introduced and seven native plants to determine deer feeding preferences among the species.

The dietary preferences of deer may be promoting the spread of such invasive species as garlic mustard, Japanese barberry and Japanese stiltgrass, according to a new study that tested white-tailed deer preferences for seven native and eight invasive plants commonly found in the northeastern U.S.

“Deer avoid certain invasive plants that are increasing in abundance in natural areas, suggesting that deer are causing unpalatable species to spread,” said Kristine Averill, a research associate in Cornell’s Section of Soil and Crop Sciences and the lead author of a study recently published online and in an upcoming print issue of the journal Biological Invasions.

The invasive herb garlic mustard, for example, has spread throughout the United States in the last 150 years and has become one of the worst forest invaders, especially in the Northeast and Midwest. In some areas, it has become the dominant forest underbrush plant, outcompeting native plants and reducing species diversity.

Garlic mustard contains chemicals to defend against being consumed, while Japanese barberry has spines, which could explain why deer don’t eat these species.

Study results showed deer prefer some introduced invasive plants – such as Oriental bittersweet, common privet and Morrow’s honeysuckle, as well as some native plants including Virginia creeper and red maple.

Within the limited number of species sampled in the study, deer favored native species overall, though they avoided native hay-scented fern, which is considered a “native invader” and is spreading in areas of forest underbrush where deer are also quite abundant.

“It’s pretty revealing that the findings we had in this study correspond to what we have been seeing in the field and confirm that deer preferences play a major role in community assembly,” Averill said.

Still, some invasive plants that deer seemed to highly prefer are increasing in abundance in natural areas, which may be because these plants produce fleshy fruits, which deer eat and then the seeds of the plant are spread in their feces, Averill said.

In the study, the researchers used captive deer at the Penn State Deer Research Center, where a herd of up to 100 deer is kept within fences. The researchers looked at feeding preferences of eight mature does without fawns across three seasons (late summer, early autumn and spring). The 15 plant species were offered in pots “cafeteria style,” where deer had a choice of each variety simultaneously. A camera fitted with a motion detector and infrared for night viewing allowed the researchers to observe and record deer behaviors. The amount of each plant consumed was also measured.

Future work may study why some preferred invasive species are still so abundant in the field and may include experiments to pair two species together in feeding trials to further assess food preferences.

“This research is important for helping conserve our forest understories and natural areas,” Averill said. “It helps us understand interactions between deer and invasives and how deer might be exacerbating invasive plant problems.”

Coauthors include David Mortensen, Erica Smithwick and Eric Post, researchers at Pennsylvania State University.

The study was funded in part by the United States Department of Agriculture.